SQE Updates๐ŸŒ en-GB

Free SQE Resources and Using SRA Sample Questions the Right Way

Plenty of good SQE prep costs nothing โ€” if you know where to look. Here's how to use the official SRA sample questions properly, plus the free tools worth your time.

Ant Law Legal Team13 July 202672 views

Most candidates I speak to have the same worry three months out: they've spent money on materials and they're still not sure they're practising the right way. Here's the reassuring bit โ€” a surprising amount of high-quality SQE prep is free, and the single most underused free resource comes straight from the people who actually write the exam. The SRA publishes sample questions. Almost everyone downloads them once, skims them, and never touches them again. That's a mistake, and it's the mistake this article is going to fix.

Let me be blunt about the trade-off first. Free resources are brilliant for calibration โ€” showing you what the real thing looks like, how the questions are worded, where the traps sit. They are poor at volume. You cannot drill 14,000 reps out of a handful of official samples. So the smart play is to use the free stuff to set your compass, and paid practice to build the mileage. Let's get into how.

Start with what the SRA actually gives you

The SRA is the source of truth for everything to do with qualifying as a solicitor in England and Wales. That includes the assessment specification, the syllabus for all 13 FLK subjects, and โ€” crucially โ€” a set of official sample questions for SQE1. Everything below assumes you'll cross-check the current position at sqe.sra.org.uk, because sitting windows, booking dates and fees change, and I'm not going to guess at numbers that might be out of date by the time you read this.

What you get for free from the SRA is genuinely valuable:

  • Sample single-best-answer multiple-choice questions for FLK1 and FLK2, with the correct answer and a short rationale.
  • The full assessment specification โ€” the map of exactly which subjects and sub-topics are examinable.
  • Guidance on how the questions are constructed, including the "single best answer" format where more than one option can look plausible.
  • Information on SQE2 skills tasks and how they're marked.

Remember the shape of what you're preparing for. SQE1 is two separate assessments โ€” FLK1 and FLK2 โ€” each 180 single-best-answer questions split across two sessions of 2 hours 33 minutes. FLK1 carries Business Law and Practice, Dispute Resolution, Contract, Tort, the Legal System of England and Wales, Constitutional and Administrative Law and EU Law, and Legal Services. FLK2 carries Property Practice, Wills and the Administration of Estates, Solicitors Accounts, Land Law, Trusts, and Criminal Law and Practice. The official samples are a thin slice across that whole range, but they're an authentic slice, which is exactly why they matter.

How to use the SRA sample questions properly

Here's where most people go wrong. They read a sample question, glance at the answer, think "yes, makes sense," and move on. That produces the illusion of competence and none of the substance. Recognition is not recall. You need to work the samples like a diagnostic instrument, not a reading exercise.

Do them under exam conditions the first time

The real assessment gives you roughly 1 minute 42 seconds per question. So when you first attempt the official samples, time yourself at that pace. No notes, no pausing to look things up. You want to know how the wording lands when the clock is running, because reading speed under pressure is a skill in itself, and the SRA's phrasing has a particular rhythm โ€” long fact pattern, precise legal question, five closely-worded options.

Reverse-engineer every single option, not just the right one

This is the technique that separates a 55% candidate from a 70% candidate. For each sample question, don't stop at "why is C correct?" Ask "why is A wrong? Why is B a trap? What tiny change to the facts would make D the right answer instead?" The distractors in a single-best-answer question are engineered to catch a specific misunderstanding. When you can name the misconception each wrong option is testing, you've learnt four or five things from one question rather than one.

The official samples aren't a mock exam. They're a set of worked examples showing you how the examiner thinks โ€” and how the examiner tries to trip you. Treat them like a masterclass, not a quiz.

Turn each sample into a rule, then leave the sample behind

Once you've dissected a sample, distil it into a one-line rule of thumb and write that in your notes. The question itself is now spent โ€” you'll remember the specific facts, which makes re-testing it worthless. What carries over to the real exam is the principle and the trap pattern. That's what you file away.

A worked example of the method

Imagine an SRA-style FLK1 sample along these lines: a company director causes the company to enter a contract that falls outside the objects in its constitution, and the other party knew about the restriction. The question asks whether the contract binds the company. Four of the five options are constructed around common half-memories โ€” "companies have unlimited capacity so it's always binding," "it's void because it's ultra vires," "it depends whether the third party paid consideration," and so on.

Working it properly, you'd note the modern position on a company's capacity, the effect of the third party's actual knowledge, and the director's separate exposure for exceeding their powers. Then you write your one-liner: "Company capacity is generally not limited by the constitution as against third parties, but a director acting beyond internal restrictions can still be liable internally." You've now converted a single question into a portable principle you can apply to a dozen variations. That's the whole game.

Log your misses like data, not shame

Every sample you get wrong goes into a wrong-answer log with three columns: the topic, the specific reason you missed it (misread the question? didn't know the rule? knew the rule but panicked?), and the corrected principle. After 40 or 50 questions a pattern emerges โ€” and it's almost never "I don't know enough law." It's usually "I over-read Contract fact patterns" or "I confuse the Solicitors Accounts client-money rules under time pressure." Free samples surface those habits early, while you can still fix them cheaply.

The free resources actually worth your time

Beyond the SRA's own materials, there's a decent amount of no-cost prep floating around. Not all of it is good. Here's what I'd actually build into a revision plan, and what I'd treat with caution.

Primary legislation and official commentary

The full text of statutes and the official explanatory notes are freely available through government legislation resources. For subjects like Land Law, Trusts and Business Law and Practice, reading the actual statutory wording โ€” rather than a paraphrase โ€” is worth an afternoon. The SQE rewards candidates who know how the words are structured, because the questions often turn on a precise threshold or defined term.

Published judgments and case summaries

Landmark authorities in Tort and Contract are widely available in full. You don't need to memorise citations for SQE1 โ€” the exam tests application of principle, not your ability to recite case names โ€” but reading a couple of the foundational negligence and misrepresentation decisions in the original gives you a sturdier grasp than any bullet-point summary. Just be disciplined: read for the principle, then move on. It's easy to disappear down a rabbit hole reading a 60-page judgment when you needed one paragraph.

The SRA's assessment guidance and specification

I keep coming back to this because candidates keep skipping it. The specification tells you exactly what's examinable. If a topic isn't on it, you don't need it. If it is on it and you've been ignoring it โ€” Solicitors Accounts, I'm looking at you โ€” that's a scoring gap you've chosen to leave open. Reading the spec properly is possibly the highest-return free hour in the whole process.

Free trials of paid tools

Most serious question banks let you sample a slice for nothing, and that's a fair way to test the quality of the explanations before committing. The Ant Law SQE Question Bank lets you try FLK1 and FLK2 questions and see how the rationales are written, which is the thing that actually matters โ€” a question is only as useful as the explanation attached to it. Use free trials to judge the depth of the reasoning, not just the raw question count.

A quick word on what to be wary of

  • Unverified pass-rate claims. If a resource quotes a precise SQE pass rate, check it against the SRA's own published reports. Pass rates move between sittings, and roughly half of candidates passing FLK1 first time is a fair rough mental model โ€” but for the actual figure, go to the source.
  • Out-of-date material. Anything written before the most recent syllabus position may quietly contradict the current spec. Date-check everything.
  • Free question dumps of unknown provenance. A wrong "correct answer" is worse than no practice at all, because you'll bank the error with confidence.

Where free stops working โ€” and why you need volume

The honest limitation of free resources is coverage. The SRA samples might give you a few dozen questions; the real FLK1 and FLK2 together throw 360 at you across a demanding day. To walk in genuinely comfortable, you need to have seen every sub-topic tested from multiple angles, repeatedly, until the pattern recognition is automatic. That's a volume problem, and free materials don't solve volume problems.

This is where a structured question bank earns its keep. The point isn't just "more questions" โ€” it's organised more questions. A good bank tags every item by FLK subject and sub-topic, so when your free-sample diagnostics reveal a weakness in, say, Trusts or Dispute Resolution, you can drill that specific gap rather than practising at random. A smart practice engine that prioritises your previously-wrong answers and low-accuracy topics turns raw volume into targeted spaced repetition, which is where the real efficiency lives. The Ant Law SQE Question Bank is built around exactly that logic, with mock exams that mirror the SRA's 90-question, 180-minute timing ratio so your stamina is trained, not just your knowledge. If you'd like a second resource to cross-reference, CELE SQE is another option worth a look.

A sensible free-plus-paid workflow

  1. Read the SRA assessment specification end to end. Mark the topics you feel shaky on.
  2. Attempt every official SRA sample under timed conditions. Dissect all five options on each.
  3. Build your wrong-answer log and identify your recurring failure patterns.
  4. Use a full question bank to drill the weak sub-topics your samples exposed, in volume, with spaced repetition.
  5. Sit full-length timed mocks in the final weeks to train pacing and stamina across the whole FLK range.
  6. Re-attempt the SRA samples once near the end, purely as a confidence check on the examiner's house style.

Don't forget the parts that aren't an exam

Qualifying as a solicitor in England and Wales isn't only about passing SQE1 and SQE2. You also need a qualifying degree or equivalent, two years of Qualifying Work Experience, and you must satisfy the SRA's character and suitability requirements. QWE is more flexible than the old training-contract model โ€” it can be gathered across up to four organisations and doesn't have to be a formal contract โ€” but the specifics of what counts, and how it's confirmed, are governed by SRA rules. For the procedural detail on QWE and on character and suitability, go to sra.org.uk rather than relying on second-hand summaries. These aren't things you want to get wrong late in the day.

A small anecdote, because it's a common trap: I've known candidates pour twelve months into revision and leave their QWE confirmation until the last minute, only to discover the person who was meant to sign it off had left the firm. The exam is the visible mountain. The admin is the crevasse you don't see. Sort both in parallel.

The one-page summary

ResourceBest forWatch out for
SRA sample questionsCalibration, examiner house style, trap-spottingLow volume โ€” not a substitute for a full bank
SRA assessment specificationKnowing exactly what's examinableSkipping it and revising the wrong things
Primary legislation & judgmentsPrecise wording, deep understandingRabbit holes and time drain
Free trials of question banksJudging explanation quality before you payBuying on question count alone
Full question bankVolume, targeted drilling, timed mocksPractising without reviewing your errors

Free resources are the compass; volume practice is the mileage. Use the SRA's samples the way an examiner would want you to โ€” slowly, forensically, one dissected question at a time โ€” and they'll teach you more about how to pass than any amount of passive reading. Then, when your diagnostics have told you exactly where you're weak, go and put in the reps.

Ready to turn those diagnostics into a plan? Run your weakest FLK1 or FLK2 topic through some timed practice today, then check the current sitting and fee details at sqe.sra.org.uk. When you want structured, tagged, exam-format questions to build real mileage on, try the Ant Law SQE Question Bank at antlaw.ai โ€” start with the subjects your SRA samples flagged, and let the wrong-answer engine do the rest.

Tags
#SQE exam preparation#SRA sample questions#FLK1 FLK2#SQE revision#best SQE question bank#solicitor qualification England Wales#SQE pass rates#qualifying work experience QWE#SRA requirements#how to become a solicitor UK#free SQE resources
Share

Found this useful? Send it along.

Share
More to read

Continue through the archive.

Browse our collection of expert essays, study notes, and exam debriefs โ€” all written for the serious SQE candidate.

Browse all articles